Modernization Versus neopatronimic model: the post–colonial simulations.
Keywords:
human dignity, neopatronimic model, competition, effectiveness, value-normative legitimacyAbstract
The gives article analyzes the essence of different version of the postcolonial modernization as well as the preconditions of the social reconstruction and social evolution within the modernization framework . The article emphasizes on the place of the value-normative sphere in the context of social clashes and models of social changes . The analysis is centeres around noneffective and neopatronimic version of state framework as regarded the limitation of human dignity, free competition and the obstacles within process of the European modernization.References
Гегель Г.В.Ф. Философская пропедевтика / Г.В.Ф. Гегель // Работы разных лет. – М.: Мысль, 1973. – 452с.
Eisenstadt S. N. Modernization. Protest and Change. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1966. – 324 p.
Эйзенштадт Ш. Революция и преобразование обществ. Сравнительное изучение цивилизаций / Ш. Эйзенштадт. – М.: Аспект-Пресс, 1999. – 415с.
Medar G.F. Heterarchies and Development Traps. – Cambr.: Cambridge University Press, 1996. – 404 p.
Kundera M. The Tragedy of Central Europe / M. Cundera // Democracy and Diversity. – The New School for Social Researches. – P.11-27.
Roninger L. The Study of Patron-Client Relations and resent Developments in Sociological Theory. – Washington. Catholic University Press. – 212 p.
Hedegreen K. Change and Modernity. – Glenview: Skott, Foresman. – 219 p.
Дергачев О. Метаморфози посткомуністичної влади // О. Дергачев, В. Полохало // Політична думка. – 1996. – № 1. – С. 12-35.
Pay L. Clientelism, Patronage and development. – Beverly Hills: Sage. – 332 p.
